Several years ago one of the most respected management-consulting firms, McKimsey & Co., defined the key business practices that characterized “well-run organizations”. The results of this study were summarized and the most fundamental conclusion was made that the most successful companies are not more successful because of any superiority in strategic planning (Schoell et al. 1987). It is impossible to determine whether a strategy was correct or not if the implementation of this strategy is unsound. The implementation of the marketing strategy is effective and the strategy is appropriate if the targets of the company met requirements for growth, share and profits (Grundey 2008). The most important factor indicating the success of the marketing strategy is the customers’ value creation by meeting their needs (Alvin J. Silk 2006). The problem exists how to evaluate and calculate in a quantitative manner the customers’ satisfaction factor. The additional efforts and resources are necessary (Minnesota Dep. 2008). The aim of this paper is to describe and to make a comparative analysis of the marketing strategy processes proposed by different authors, to make quantitative analysis of the customers’ satisfaction, referring to the particular example of the company.
Dudzevičiūtė, G., & Peleckienė, V. (2010). Marketing strategy process: Quantitative analysis of the customers’ satisfaction. Business: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 345-352. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2010.37
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms
that this article contains no violation of any existing copyright or other third party right or any material of a libelous, confidential, or otherwise unlawful nature, and that I will indemnify and keep indemnified the Editor and THE PUBLISHER against all claims and expenses (including legal costs and expenses) arising from any breach of this warranty and the other warranties on my behalf in this agreement;
that I have obtained permission for and acknowledged the source of any illustrations, diagrams or other material included in the article of which I am not the copyright owner.
on behalf of any co-authors, I agree to this work being published in Creativity Studies as Open Access, and licenced under a Creative Commons Licence, 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This licence allows for the fullest distribution and re-use of the work for the benefit of scholarly information.
For authors that are not copyright owners in the work (for example government employees), please contact VILNIUS TECH to make alternative agreements.
