Share:


Creativity as an essential aspect in medical education

    Myroslava Shumylo   Affiliation
    ; Oksana Isayeva   Affiliation
    ; Irena Khmilyar   Affiliation
    ; Ivanna Huziy   Affiliation
    ; Halyna Yaremko   Affiliation
    ; Mariana Drachuk   Affiliation

Abstract

The article deals with the issues of developing students’ creative skills at medical educational institutions. Intensification of students’ creative potential occurs through the formation of thinking, research and communication skills, ability to interact with information means and technologies. Second-year students of General Medicine Faculty were involved in the experiment at Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University in Ukraine. Experimental and control groups included 172 students in each one. We singled out two groups: a control group – training based on the available basic course “Professional English in Medicine” and an experimental group – training based on a combination of two courses: the basic course “Professional English in Medicine” and the elective course “Special Medical Terminology”. Homogeneity of the control and experimental groups was checked using Student’s t-test. Testing 0-hypothesis showed no significant differences between samples for the reliability level 0.05 (5% probability). At the first stage of the experimental study, students’ performance was considered at the beginning of the experiment in the control and experimental groups. Students were divided into three levels: high (82–100 points), medium (64–81 points) and low (50–63 points). Certainty of differences between groups was tested using Pearson’s chi-squared test (χ2), according to which the critical value was = 5.991, and the corresponding empirical value = 0.414. Thus, any differences between the results of the control and experimental groups are random variations with a probability of less than 5%, and, therefore, the samples are homogeneous by the research indicator. Verification of reliability of the obtained results in improving the level of creativity in students was checked by Pearson’s chi-squared test (χ2), according to which the critical value equaled 5.991 and the corresponding empirical value = 6.11. Thus, any differences between the results of the control and experimental groups are with a probability of less than 5% and based on the result of introduction of an active pedagogical factor into the educational process, and, therefore, the difference between the control and experimental groups is expected for the studied indicator. To define creative abilities, we used Joy Paul Guilford’s parameters and factors for interpreting variations in creativity: sensitivity to problems; flexibility and fluency; originality; synthesis, analysis; reorganizing or redefining; complexity and evaluation; to determine verbal aspect of students’ creativity, we applied the techniques suggested by Walther Moede and Sarnoff A. Mednick. All students performed significant improvement in the ability to generate a lot of ideas; they also showed a steady increase in such forms of creativity as sensitivity to problems, flexibility and fluency. Slight increase was noticed in reorganizing or redefining, complexity and evaluation. The students’ ability to solve problems by realization of relevant analytical and synthetic operations must be taken into consideration while developing creativity and creative communication of medical students.


 

Keyword : communication, creativity, independence, medical education, self-development, students

How to Cite
Shumylo, M., Isayeva, O., Khmilyar, I., Huziy, I., Yaremko, H., & Drachuk, M. (2022). Creativity as an essential aspect in medical education. Creativity Studies, 15(1), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.13320
Published in Issue
Mar 1, 2022
Abstract Views
771
PDF Downloads
645
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Agars, M. D., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Creativity in the workplace: Introduction to the special issue. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15(2), 5–6.

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10964

Craft, A., Cremin, T., & Burnard, P. (Eds.). (2008). Creative Learning 3–11, and how we document it. Trentham Books.

Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554069

Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Introduction: Teaching and learning for understanding. In L. Darling-Hammond, B. Barron, P. D. Pearson, A. H. Schoenfeld, E. K. Stage, T. D. Zimmerman, G. N. Cervetti, & Tilson, J. L., Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (pp. 1–10). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Furnham, A. (1999). Personality and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88(2), 407–408. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.2.407

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Guilford, J. P. (2017). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37–59). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315126265-2

Hoidn, S., & Karkkainen, K. (2014). OECD Education Working Papers series. Promoting skills for innovation in Higher Education: A literature review on the effectiveness of problem-based learning and of teaching behaviours. OECD Education Working Papers No. 100. EDU/WKP(2013)15. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5k3tsj67l226-en.pdf?expires=1633522641&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=BD9956076C2F31FDCFD32056CCBB3AFA

Irvin, S. M. (1996). Creative teaching strategies. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 27(3), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19960501-06

Isayeva, O. (2014). Modeling cultural competence in teaching humanities to medical students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(12B), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-12B-10

Isayeva, O., Shumylo, M., Khmilyar, I., Myskiv, I., & Mylyk, O. (2020). Blended learning in higher medical education: Principles and strategies of teaching foreign languages. Advanced Education, 14, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.183725

Jordan Starko, A. (2013). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203115176

Kaufman, J. C. (2009). Creativity, intelligence, and culture: Connections and possibilities. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds.), Knowledge and space. Milieus of creativity: An interdisciplinary approach to spatiality of creativity, Vol. 2 (pp. 155–168). P. Meusburger (Ed.). Springer Science + Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_8

Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Academics, 16(2–3), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473

Ku, Y.-L., Lo, Ch.-H. K., Wang, J.-J., Hsieh, J. L., & Chen, K.-M. (2002). The effectiveness of teaching strategies for creativity in a nursing concepts teaching protocol on the creative thinking of two-year RN-BSN students. Journal of Nursing Research, 10(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JNR.0000347589.98025.63

Lafferty, S. F. (2004). Overview of education in creativity and problem-solving in four-year colleges and universities. Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

Moran, S. (2010). Creative in school. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 319–360). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Mukan, N., Yaremko, H., Kozlovskiy, Y., Ortynskiy, V., & Isayeva, O. (2019). Teachers’ continuous professional development: Australian experience. Advanced Education, 12, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.166606

National Education Association. (2010). 21st century skills books. Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs”. https://www.aledoisd.org/cms/lib/TX02205721/Centricity/Domain/2020/Preparing21C_Learners.pdf

Preckel, F., Holling, H.; Wiese, M. (2006). Relationship of intelligence and creativity in gifted and non-gifted students: An investigation of threshold theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.022

Pysklynets, U. (2010). Rozvytok tekhnichnoii tvorchosti studentiv-medykiv pid chas vyvchennia kursu “Medychna biolohiia i fizyka”. Pedahohichnyi almanakh, 7, 150–153.

Rankin, J., & Brown, V. (2016). Creative teaching method as a learning strategy for student midwives: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 38, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.009

Richards, R. (Ed.). (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11595-000

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and education. Creative Education, 1(3), 166–169. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2010.13026

Shin, K., Jung, D. Y., Shin, S., & Kim, M. S. (2006). Critical thinking dispositions and skills of senior nursing students in associate, baccalaureate, and RN-To-BSN programs. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(6), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060601-08

Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01254.x

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607

Sydorchuk, А. S., Moskaliuk, V. D., Randiuk, Y. O., Sorokhan, V. D., Golyar, O. I., Sydorchuk, L. І., & Humenna, A. V. (2016). Aspects of development of leader creative thinking of medical student at the undergraduate level of medical education. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 69(6), 809–812.

Thompson, T. (2017). Teaching creativity through inquiry science. Gifted Child Today, 40(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217516675863

Ushynskyi, K. (2004). Chelovek kak predmet vospitanija: Opyt pedagogicheskoj antropologii. Grand-Fair.

Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). Working memory capacity, attentional focus, and problem solving. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 258–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412447622

Zha, P., Walczyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Tobacyk, J. J., & Walczyk, D. F. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism – collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_10