Distribution of green spaces across socio-economic groups: a study of Bhubaneswar, India
Abstract
Urban green spaces (UGS) are linked with numerous health benefits. However, recent studies have highlighted an increased level of disparity in their distribution across different socio-economic groups. Adequate number of UGS and their size play an important role to achieve spatial equity. The purpose of this study is to analyze the availability of UGS across all socio-economic groups of Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India. Methods: The socio-economic groups are created by using the ward level socio-economic census data of Bhubaneswar and and PCA method of analysis. The UGS are identified using satellite images if they fulfil the criteria such as: named as a park or garden and has a definitive boundary in the year 2021. A one-way ANOVA is used for the analysis. Result: The study revealed a non-uniform distribution; 27 out of 67 wards do not have any form of parks in their vicinity. From the equity point of view, the UGS distribution is examined for parks and overall UGS. There is no major difference found in terms of availability of parks in different SES statistically. However, park area average is observed to be the higher in middle deprived communities (26738.32 m2/neighborhood) followed by least deprived communities (22386.7378 m2/neighborhood) but the average number of parks seem to be the lowest in the least deprived communities (1 park/neighborhood). The land allocation per capita for overall UGS came to be the highest for the most deprived neighborhoods (0.0146 km2/1000 population). The bigger UGS are in the most deprived wards probably because there is availability of land and low population density.
Keyword : park equity, socio-economic status, principal component analysis, spatial distribution, neighborhoods, Bhubaneswar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Adlakha, D., Hipp, J., Sallis, J., & Brownson, R. (2018). Exploring neighborhood environments and active commuting in Chennai, India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1840. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091840
Agarwal, M. K., Sehgal, V., & Ogra, A. (2021). A critical review of standards to examine the parameters of Child-Friendly Environment (CFE) in parks and open space of planned neighborhoods: A case of Lucknow City, India. Social Sciences, 10(6), 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10060199
Anand, G., & Deb, A. (2017). Planning, ‘violations’, and urban inclusion: A study of Bhubaneswar. Indian Institute for Human Settlements. https://doi.org/10.24943/iihsyuva.bhubaneshwar.2017
American Psychological Association. (2018). APA dictionary of psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/socioeconomic-status
Bardhan, R., Kurisu, K., & Hanaki, K. (2015). Does compact urban forms relate to good quality of life in high density cities of India? Case of Kolkata. Cities, 48, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.005
Berkman, L. F., & Macintyre, S. (1997). The measurement of social class in health studies: Old measures and new formulations. IARC Scientific Publications, (138), 51–64.
Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation. (n.d.). https://www.bmc.gov.in/
Boone, C. G., Buckley, G. L., Grove, J. M., & Sister, C. (2009). Parks and people: An environmental justice inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(4), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903102949
Census PCA. (2011). Census of India 2011: Primary census abstract [Data file]. Office of Register General and Census Commissioner of India. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/6577
Census HH Amenities. (2011). Census of India 2011: H-series-tables on houses, household amenities and assets [Data file]. Office of Register General and Census Commissioner of India. https://censusindia.gov.in/nada/index.php/catalog/9684
Chandrasiri, O., & Arifwidodo, S. (2017). Inequality in active public park: A case study of Benjakitti Park in Bangkok, Thailand. Procedia Engineering, 198, 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.083
Chimankar, D. A. (2016). Urbanization and condition of urban slums in India. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 48(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.12466
Chuang, W.-C., Boone, C. G., Locke, D. H., Grove, J. M., Whitmer, A., Buckley, G., & Zhang, S. (2017). Tree canopy change and neighborhood stability: A comparative analysis of Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 27, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.030
Comber, A., Brunsdon, C., & Green, E. (2008). Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.01.002
Cortinovis, C., Zulian, G., & Geneletti, D. (2018). Assessing nature-based recreation to support urban green infrastructure planning in Trento (Italy). Land, 7(4), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040112
Crawford, D., Timperio, A., Giles-Corti, B., Ball, K., Hume, C., Roberts, R., Andrianopoulos, N., & Salmon, J. (2008). Do features of public open spaces vary according to neighbourhood socio-economic status? Health & Place, 14(4), 889–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.11.002
Estabrooks, P. A., Lee, R. E., & Gyurcsik, N. C. (2003). Resources for physical activity participation: Does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_05
Fasihi, H., & Parizadi, T. (2020). Analysis of spatial equity and access to urban parks in Ilam, Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 260, 110122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110122
Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data–or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2001.0003
Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., Lange, A., & Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018
Gilliland, J., Holmes, M., Irwin, J. D., & Tucker, P. (2006). Environmental equity is child’s play: Mapping public provision of recreation opportunities in urban neighbourhoods. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 1(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450120600914522
Gurtoo, A., & Williams, C. C. (2009). Entrepreneurship and the informal sector: some lessons from India. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009787414280
Ibes, D. C. (2015). A multi-dimensional classification and equity analysis of an urban park system: A novel methodology and case study application. Landscape and Urban Planning, 137, 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.014
Islam, J., Ali, Md. J., & Mithun, S. (2022). Slums in India: Making sense of place in urban planning. GeoJournal, 87, 1913–1928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10357-3
Kalia, R. (1997). Bhubaneswar: Contrasting visions in traditional Indian and modern European Architecture. Journal of Urban History, 23(2), 164–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/009614429702300202
Krishnan, V. (2010). Constructing an area-based socioeconomic index: A principal components analysis approach [Early Child Development Mapping Project]. Edmonton, Alberta.
Lee, R. E., Cubbin, C., & Winkleby, M. (2007). Contribution of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and physical activity resources to physical activity among women. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(10), 882–890. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.054098
Liberatos, P., Link, B. G., & Kelsey, J. L. (1988). The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiologic Reviews, 10(1), 87–121. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036030
McKenzie, D. J. (2005). Measuring inequality with asset indicators. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 229–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-005-0224-7
Mishra, S. V. (2018). Urban deprivation in a global south city-a neighborhood scale study of Kolkata, India. Habitat International, 80, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.08.006
Moore, L. V., Diez Roux, A. V., Evenson, K. R., McGinn, A. P., & Brines, S. J. (2008). Availability of recreational resources in minority and low socioeconomic status areas. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.021
Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing Leisure, 6(4), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606710110084651
Nissanke, M., & Thorbecke, E. (2010). Comparative analysis of the globalization-poverty nexus in Asia, Latin America, and Africa. World Development, 38(6), 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.02.003
Oh, K., & Jeong, S. (2007). Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(1–2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.01.014
Pawasarat, J., & Stetzer, F. (1998). Removing transportation barriers to employment: Assessing driver’s license and vehicle ownership patterns of low- Income populations. https://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1135&context=eti_pubs
Pieters, J. (2010). Growth and inequality in India: Analysis of an extended social accounting matrix. World Development, 38(3), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.09.006
Powell, L. M., Slater, S., Chaloupka, F. J., & Harper, D. (2006). Availability of physical activity–related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: A national study. American Journal of Public Health, 96(9), 1676–1680. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.065573
Rigolon, A. (2016). A complex landscape of inequity in access to urban parks: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 153, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.017
Sathyakumar, V., Ramsankaran, R., & Bardhan, R. (2019). Linking remotely sensed Urban Green Space (UGS) distribution patterns and Socio-Economic Status (SES) - A multi-scale probabilistic analysis based in Mumbai, India. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 56(5), 645–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1549819
Sewell, W. H., & Shah, V. P. (1967). Socioeconomic status, intelligence, and the attainment of higher education. Sociology of Education, 40(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112184
Shen, Q. (2001). A spatial analysis of job openings and access in a US metropolitan area. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 53–68.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976355
Sister, C., Wolch, J., & Wilson, J. (2010). Got green? Addressing environmental justice in park provision. GeoJournal, 75(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-009-9303-8
Stoll, M. A. (2005). Job sprawl and the spatial mismatch between blacks and jobs. The Brookings Institution.
Stromberg, P. M., Öhrner, E., Brockwell, E., & Liu, Z. (2021). Valuing urban green amenities with an inequality lens. Ecological Economics, 186, 107067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107067
Tan, P. Y., & Samsudin, R. (2017). Effects of spatial scale on assessment of spatial equity of urban park provision. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.11.001
Taubenböck, H., & Kraff, N. J. (2014). The physical face of slums: A structural comparison of slums in Mumbai, India, based on remotely sensed data. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(1), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-013-9333-x
Tu, X., Huang, G., & Wu, J. (2018). Contrary to common observations in the west, urban park access is only weakly related to neighborhood socioeconomic conditions in Beijing, China. Sustainability, 10(4), 1115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041115
Vaughan, K. B., Kaczynski, A. T., Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., Besenyi, G. M., Bergstrom, R., & Heinrich, K. M. (2013). Exploring the distribution of park availability, features, and quality across Kansas City, Missouri by income and race/ethnicity: An environmental justice investigation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(S1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9425-y
Veal, A. (2013). Open space planning standards in Australia: In search of origins. Australian Planner, 50(3), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2012.739567
Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal components analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21(6), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl029
Wang, D., Brown, G., & Liu, Y. (2015). The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007
Weber, M. (1946). Class, status, party. In H. H. Girth, & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 180–195). Oxford University. http://www.soc.duke.edu/~jmoody77/TheoryNotes/Weber_CSP.htm
Wolch, J., Wilson, J. P., & Fehrenbach, J. (2005). Parks and park funding in Los Angeles: An equity-mapping analysis. Urban Geography, 26(1), 4–35. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.26.1.4
Xiao, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z., & Tang, Z. (2017). An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai – Implications for the social equity in urban China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.007
Zhang, R., Zhang, C. Q., Cheng, W., Lai, P. C., & Schüz, B. (2021). The neighborhood socioeconomic inequalities in urban parks in a High-density City: An environmental justice perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 211, 104099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104099