Exploring the formation mechanism of technology standard competitiveness in artificial intelligence industry: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the complex mechanism influencing technology standard competitiveness (TSC) in the artificial intelligence industry. Compared with research using traditional linear models, this research adopts the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to obtain the multiple equivalent paths for different factors that jointly produce TSC. The sample of this study involves 32 countries, and the research framework is constructed from the technological, organizational, and environmental aspects of the phenomenon. The fsQCA method was used to demonstrate the asymmetric relationship between cause and effect. The results indicate four configuration paths but no necessary conditions leading to TSC. Academic research intensity and market size play vital roles in developing TSC. Some logically complementary relationships exist between organizational participation, technological innovation ability, and international competitive pressure. These findings are helpful for policymakers in their formulation of artificial intelligence– related strategies.
Keyword : technology standardization, artificial intelligence industry, fsQCA, technology–organization–environment (TOE) framework, technology standard competitiveness, configurations
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Acquah, I. S. K., Naude, M. J., & Sendra-García, J. (2021). Supply chain collaboration in the petroleum sector of an emerging economy: Comparing results from symmetrical and asymmetrical approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120568
af Malmborg, F., & Trondal, J. (2021). Discursive framing and organizational venues: Mechanisms of artificial intelligence policy adoption. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211007533
Ahmadi, H., Nilashi, M., Shahmoradi, L., & Ibrahim, O. (2017). Hospital Information System adoption: Expert perspectives on an adoption framework for Malaysian public hospitals. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.023
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431
Amsden, A. H. (2001). The rise of “the rest”: Challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195139690.003.0001
Angulo, J., Calzada, J., & Estruch, A. (2011). Selection of standards for digital television: The battle for Latin America. Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.07.007
Arrow, K. J., Forsythe, R., Gorham, M., Hahn, R., Hanson, R., Ledyard, J. O., Levmore, S., Litan, R., Milgrom, P., Nelson, F. D., Neumann, G. R., Ottaviani, M., Schelling, T. C., Shiller, R. J., Smith, V. L., Snowberg, E., Sunstein, C. R., Tetlock, P. C., Tetlock, P. E., Varian, H. R., Wolfers, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2008). The promise of prediction markets. Science, 320(5878), 877–878. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157679
Bekker, B., Eberhard, A., Gaunt, T., & Marquard, A. (2008). South Africa’s rapid electrification programme: Policy, institutional, planning, financing and technical innovations. Energy Policy, 36(8), 3125–3137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.04.014
Blind, K. (2002). Driving forces for standardization at standardization development organizations. Applied Economics, 34(16), 1985–1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840110111158
Blind, K. (2006). Explanatory factors for participation in formal standardisation processes: Empirical evidence at firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500143970
Blind, K. (2012). The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Research Policy, 41(2), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.008
Blind, K., & Mangelsdorf, A. (2016). Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 48, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.001
Blind, K., & Thumm, N. (2004). Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: Empirical evidence and policy implications. Research Policy, 33(10), 1583–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.08.007
Blind, K., & von Laer, M. (2022). Paving the path: drivers of standardization participation at ISO. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47, 1115–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09871-4
Blind, K., Petersen, S. S., & Riillo, C. A. (2017). The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets. Research Policy, 46(1), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.003
Borgman, H. P., Bahli, B., Heier, H., & Schewski, F. (2013). Cloudrise: Exploring cloud computing adoption and governance with the TOE framework. In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4425–4435). Wailea, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.132
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612450120
Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers. In the new global rulers. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691144795.001.0001
Chang, S.-H. (2021). Technical trends of artificial intelligence in standard-essential patents. Data Technologies and Applications, 55(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-10-2019-0178
Chen, G., Kang, H., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2019). Key determinants of online fiscal transparency: A technology-organization-environment framework. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(3), 606–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1486213
Cho, J., Cheon, Y., Jun, J. W., & Lee, S. (2022). Digital advertising policy acceptance by out-of-home advertising firms: A combination of TAM and TOE framework. International Journal of Advertising, 41(3), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1888562
Choung, J. Y., Ji, I., & Hameed, T. (2011). International standardization strategies of latecomers: The cases of Korean TPEG, T-DMB, and binary CDMA. World Development, 39(5), 824–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.09.007
Cruz-Jesus, F., Pinheiro, A., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Understanding CRM adoption stages: Empirical analysis building on the TOE framework. Computers in Industry, 109, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.03.007
Dahms, S. (2019). Foreign-owned subsidiary knowledge sourcing: The role of location and expatriates. Journal of Business Research, 105, 178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.013
De Toni, A. F., & Pessot, E. (2021). Investigating organisational learning to master project complexity: An embedded case study. Journal of Business Research, 129, 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.027
De Vries, H. J., & Slob, F. J. (2006). Best practice in company standardization. International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research (IJITSR), 4(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.4018/jitsr.2006010104
De Vries, H., Blind, K., Mangelsdorf, A., Verheul, H., & van der Zwan, J. (2009). SME access to European standardization. Enabling small and medium-sized enterprises to achieve greater benefit from standards and from involvement in standardization. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.
Delcamp, H., & Leiponen, A. (2014). Innovating standards through informal consortia: The case of wireless telecommunications. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 36, 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.07.004
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Doganoglu, T., & Wright, J. (2006). Multihoming and compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.004
Dubé, L., Pingali, P., & Webb, P. (2012). Paths of convergence for agriculture, health, and wealth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(31), 12294–12301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912951109
Egyedi, T. M. (2006). Beyond consortia, beyond standardization? Redefining the consortium problem. In K. Jakobs (Ed.), Advanced topics in information technology standards and standardization research (vol. 1, pp. 91–110). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-938-0.ch005
Eisingerich, A. B., Bell, S. J., & Tracey, P. (2010). How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty. Research Policy, 39(2), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.007
Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70–83.
Fatima, S., Desouza, K. C., & Dawson, G. S. (2020). National strategic artificial intelligence plans: A multi-dimensional analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 67, 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.07.008
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. The Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
Fontagné, L., Orefice, G., Piermartini, R., & Rocha, N. (2015). Product standards and margins of trade: Firm-level evidence. Journal of International Economics, 97(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.04.008
Funk, J. L., & Methe, D. T. (2001). Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: The case of mobile communication. Research Policy, 30(4), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00095-0
Gao, F., Jia, X., Zhao, Z., Chen, C. C., Xu, F., Geng, Z., & Song, X. (2021). Bibliometric analysis on tendency and topics of artificial intelligence over last decade. Microsystem Technologies, 27(4), 1545–1557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-019-04426-y
Gao, P. (2007). Counter‐networks in standardization: A perspective of developing countries. Information Systems Journal, 17(4), 391–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00262.x
Gao, P., Yu, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2014). Government in standardization in the catching-up context: Case of China’s mobile system. Telecommunications Policy, 38(2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2013.10.002
Gao, X. (2014). A latecomer’s strategy to promote a technology standard: The case of Datang and TD-SCDMA. Research Policy, 43(3), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.003
García-Sánchez, E., García-Morales, V. J., & Martín-Rojas, R. (2018). Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 345–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0436-9
Hidemichi, F., & Shunsuke, M. (2017), Trends and priority shifts in artificial intelligence technology invention: A global patent analysis (RIETI Discussion Paper Series, p. 17 E-066). Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Ho, J. Y., & O’Sullivan, E. (2017). Strategic standardisation of smart systems: A roadmapping process in support of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.014
Hobday, M. (1995). East Asian latecomer firms: Learning the technology of electronics. World Development, 23(7), 1171–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00035-B
Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China. (2021). 2020 Global Artificial Intelligence Innovation Index report. https://netl.istic.ac.cn/site/objdata/466496091303411EB27FB4298C9BA46C/0120211000781706
Jakobs, K., Procter, R., & Williams, R. (1998). User participation in standards setting – the panacea? StandardView, 6(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1145/301688.301693
Jancenelle, V. E. (2021). Tangible−intangible resource composition and firm success. Technovation, 108, 102337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102337
Jho, W. (2007). Global political economy of technology standardization: A case of the Korean mobile telecommunications market. Telecommunications Policy, 31(2), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2006.12.004
Jiang, H., Gao, S., Zhao, S., & Chen, H. (2020a). Competition of technology standards in Industry 4.0: An innovation ecosystem perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(4), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2718
Jiang, H., Sun, S., Xu, H., Zhao, S., & Chen, Y. (2020b). Enterprises’ network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37(4), 749–765. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2716
Jiang, H., Zhao, S., Li, Z., & Chen, Y. (2016). Interaction between technology standardization and technology development: A coupling effect study. Information Technology and Management, 17(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-015-0215-7
Jiang, H., Zhao, S., Zhang, S., & Xu, X. (2018a). The adaptive mechanism between technology standardization and technology development: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.015
Jiang, H., Zhao, S., Zhang, Z. J., & Yi, Y. (2018b). Exploring the mechanism of technology standardization and innovation using the solidification theory of binary eutectic alloy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.08.015
Kang, B., Huo, D., & Motohashi, K. (2014). Comparison of Chinese and Korean companies in ICT global standardization: Essential patent analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 38(10), 902–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.09.004
Kano, S. (2000). Technical innovations, standardization and regional comparison – a case study in mobile communications. Telecommunications Policy, 24(4), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00020-3
Khemani, R. S. (1993). Glossary of industrial organisation economics and competition law. OECD Publications and Information Centre.
Kim, K., Jung, S., Hwang, J., & Hong, A. (2018). A dynamic framework for analyzing technology standardisation using network analysis and game theory. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(5), 540–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1340639
Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Harvard Business School Press.
Kshetri, N., Palvia, P., & Dai, H. (2011). Chinese institutions and standardization: The case of government support to domestic third generation cellular standard. Telecommunications Policy, 35(5), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2011.03.005
Kwak, J., Lee, H., & Fomin, V. V. (2011). Government coordination of conflicting interests in standardisation: Case studies of indigenous ICT standards in China and South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(7), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.592285
Lee, H., & Oh, S. (2006). A standards war waged by a developing country: Understanding international standard setting from the actor-network perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(3), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.10.002
Lee, H., & Oh, S. (2008). The political economy of standards setting by newcomers: China’s WAPI and South Korea’s WIPI. Telecommunications Policy, 32(9–10), 662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2008.07.008
Lee, H., Chan, S., & Oh, S. (2009). China’s ICT standards policy after the WTO accession: Techno‐national versus techno‐globalism. Info, 11(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636690910932966
Lee, K., Lim, C., & Song, W. (2005). Emerging digital technology as a window of opportunity and technological leapfrogging: Catch-up in digital TV by the Korean firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 29(1–2), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2005.006004
Li, Y., Guo, H., Cooper, S. Y., & Wang, H. (2019). The influencing factors of the technology standard alliance collaborative innovation of emerging industry. Sustainability, 11(24), 6930. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11246930
Liu, S. G., Li, Z., & Ba, L. (2020, February). Impact of artificial intelligence 2.0 on teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (pp. 128–133).
Lyu, Y. B., Wei, M., & Lin G. G. (2019). Research of technology fusion based on patentometrics: Judge, status and trends-take the field of Internet of Things and artificial intelligence as an example. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., (04), 16–31. (in Chinese)
Malik, S., Chadhar, M., Vatanasakdakul, S., & Chetty, M. (2021). Factors affecting the organizational adoption of blockchain technology: Extending the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework in the Australian context. Sustainability, 13(16), 9404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169404
Margetis, G., Ntoa, S., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2021). Human‐centered design of artificial intelligence. In G. Salvendy & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (5th ed.) (pp. 1085–1106). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch42
Markard, J., & Erlinghagen, S. (2017). Technology users and standardization: Game changing strategies in the field of smart meter technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.023
Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0728
Moon, S., & Lee, H. (2017, June). Impact of the TBT and the technical innovation on exports. in Proceedings 2017 ISPIM Innovation Symposium, Vienna, Austria.
Moon, S., & Lee, H. (2021). The primary actors of technology standardization in the manufacturing industry. IEEE Access, 9, 101886–101901. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097800
Moon, S., Chin, K., & Lee, H. (2018, August). IEC standard revision dynamics: Symbiosis between standard and technology. In 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (pp. 1–8). Honolulu, HI, USA. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2018.8481751
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2019). U.S. leadership in AI: A plan for federal engagement in developing technical standards and related tools. NIST. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2019/08/10/ai_standards_fedengagement_plan_9aug2019.pdf
Narayanan, V. K., & Chen, T. (2012). Research on technology standards: Accomplishment and challenges. Research Policy, 41(8), 1375–1406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.006
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
O’Sullivan, E., & Brévignon-Dodin, L. (2012). Role of standardisation in support of emerging technologies. Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge.
Özsomer, A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2000). The effects of technology standards on the structure of the global PC industry. European Journal of Marketing, 34(9/10), 1199–1220. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010342601
Paik, J. H., Kim, M. K., & Park, J. H. (2017). The antecedents and consequences of technology standardizations in Korean IT small and medium-sized enterprises. Information Technology and Management, 18(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-016-0268-2
Papatheodorou, A., & Pappas, N. (2017). Economic recession, job vulnerability, and tourism decision making: A qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 56(5), 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516651334
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102310
Pateli, A., Mylonas, N., & Spyrou, A. (2020). Organizational adoption of social media in the hospitality industry: An integrated approach based on DIT and TOE frameworks. Sustainability, 12(17), 7132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177132
Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2006). User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Ragin, C. C. (2008a). Measurement versus calibration: A set-theoretic approach. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology (pp. 174–198). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0008
Ragin, C. C. (2008b). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Ragin, C. C., & Fiss, P. C. (2008). Net effects analysis versus configurational analysis: An empirical demonstration. In Ragin, C. C., Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond (pp. 190–212). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
Russo, I., Confente, I., Gligor, D., & Cobelli, N. (2019). A roadmap for applying qualitative comparative analysis in supply chain research: The reverse supply chain case. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2018-0056
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
Schneider, M. R., Schulze-Bentrop, C., & Paunescu, M. (2010). Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.36
Shin, D. H., Kim, H., & Hwang, J. (2015). Standardization revisited: A critical literature review on standards and innovation. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 38, 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2014.09.002
Su, H., Qu, X., Tian, S., Ma, Q., Li, L., & Chen, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence empowerment: The impact of research and development investment on green radical innovation in high‐tech enterprises. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(3), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2853
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books. Lexington, Mass.
Tseng, C. Y., & Ting, P. H. (2013). Patent analysis for technology development of artificial intelligence: A country-level comparative study. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 15(4), 463–475.
Utterback, J. M. (1994). Radical innovation and corporate regeneration. Research Technology Management, 37(4), 10.
van de Kaa, G., & Greeven, M. (2017). LED standardization in China and South East Asia: Stakeholders, infrastructure and institutional regimes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 863–870.
Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and external antecedents of process innovation: A review and extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771698
Wakke, P., Blind, K., & Ramel, F. (2016). The impact of participation within formal standardization on firm performance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 45(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0465-3
Wang, D. P., Wei, X. Y., & Fang, F. (2016). The resource evolution of standard alliance by technology standardization. Chinese Management Studies, 10(4), 787–801.
Wen, J., Qualls, W. J., & Zeng, D. (2020). Standardization alliance networks, standard-setting influence, and new product outcomes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12520
Whitley, R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. OUP Oxford.
Wiegmann, P. M., de Vries, H. J., & Blind, K. (2017). Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 46(8), 1370–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.002
Witt, M. A., Fainshmidt, S., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Our board, our rules: Nonconformity to global corporate governance norms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211022726
Woodside, A. G. (2018). Have your cake and eat it too: Achieving scientific legitimacy. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.028
Wu, F., Lu, C., Zhu, M., Chen, H., Zhu, J., Yu, K., Li, L., Li, M., Chen, Q., Li, X., Cao, X., Wang, Z., Zha, Z., Zhuang, Y. & Pan, Y. (2020). Towards a new generation of artificial intelligence in China. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(6), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0183-4
Zhang, Y. S., & He R. F. (2015). Formation mechanisms of technical standard competitive advantages of hi-tech enterprises. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 4, 126–130.
Zielke, T. (2020, September). Is artificial intelligence ready for standardization? In M. Yilmaz, J. Niemann, P. Clarke, & R. Messnarz (Eds.), Communications in computer and information science: Vol. 1251. Systems, software and services process improvement (pp. 259–274). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_19
Zoo, H., de Vries, H. J., & Lee, H. (2017). Interplay of innovation and standardization: Exploring the relevance in developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.033