Share:


The impact of traffic flow structure on traffic safety: the case of Slovenian motorways

    Marina Zanne Affiliation
    ; Aleš Groznik Affiliation

Abstract

Road traffic accident is an accident on a public road in which at least one moving vehicle has been involved and material damage or injury or death has occurred. Traffic accidents occur for various reasons, with one of them being the transport infrastructure and next the condition of traffic environment. Motorways are considered to be the safest roads, which have initially been planned as dedicated roads intended to be travelled only by personal cars, but the evolution of modal split of freight transport in Europe is causing the heterogeneity of traffic flows on these roads, which consequently affects the traffic safety. The aim of this paper is to explore the effects of changing volume and structure of traffic flows on road safety on Slovenian motorways. After the exhaustive analysis of past data, the paper provides different models for forecasting traffic safety on Slovenian motorways.


First published online 29 March 2016

Keyword : motorways, traffic flow, traffic flows structure, traffic safety, road accident, accident rate, safety performance function (SPF), ARIMA model

How to Cite
Zanne, M., & Groznik, A. (2018). The impact of traffic flow structure on traffic safety: the case of Slovenian motorways. Transport, 33(1), 216-222. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2016.1153519
Published in Issue
Jan 26, 2018
Abstract Views
1164
PDF Downloads
700
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Bell, W. R.; Hillmer, S. C. 1984. Issues Involved with the Seasonal Adjustment of Economic Time Series. SRD Research Report No: CENSUS/SRD/RR-84/09. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C. 100 p. Available from Internet:https://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/rr84-09.pdf

Box, G. E. P.; Jenkins, G. M.; Reinsel, G. C. 2013. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 755 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118619193

Brvar, B. 2011. Uradna in dejanska statistika mrtvih v prometu, Delo, 02.08.2011. Available from Internet: http://www.delo.si/mnenja/gostujoce-pero/uradna-in-dejanska-statistika-mrtvih-v-prometu.html (in Slovenian).

Cowie, J. 2009. The Economics of Transport: a Theoretical and Applied Perspective. 1st edition. Routledge. 400 p.

Dadić, I.; Kos, G. 2007. Teorija i organizacija prometnih tokova. Fakultet prometnih znanosti, Sveučilište u Zagrebu. 169 c. (in Croatian).

DRSzi. 2013. Podatki o prometu (2001–2012). Direkcija Respublike Slovenije za infrastrukturo (DRSzi). Available from Internet: http://www.di.gov.si/si/delovna_podrocja_in_po-datki/ceste_in_promet/podatki_o_prometu (in Slovenian).

EC. 2013a. Road Safety Vademecum – Road Safety Trends, Statistics and Challenges in the EU 2011–2012. European Commission, DG for Mobility and Transport, Unit C.4 – Road Safety. 17 p. Available from Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/pdf/vademecum_2013.pdf

EC. 2013b. Towards a Strategy on Serious Road Traffic Injuries – Frequently Asked Questions. European Commission, Press Release Database. 5 p. Available from Internet: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-232_en.htm

Eenink, R.; Reurings, M.; Elvik, R.; Cardoso, J.; Wichert, S.; Stefan, C. 2008. Accident Prediction Models and Road Safety Impact Assessment: Recommendations for Using These Tools. Contract N. 506184. RIPCORD-ISEREST Deliverable D2. 20 p. Available from Internet: http://ec.europa.eu/trans-port/roadsafety_library/publications/ripcord_d02_road_safety_impact_assessment.pdf

Elvik, R.; Høye, A.; Vaa, T.; Sørensen, M. 2009. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures. 2nd edition. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 1124 p.

ETSC. 2008. Fate of EU Motorway Safety in Hands of MEPs. European Transport Safety Council (ETSC). 2 p. Available from Internet: http://archive.etsc.eu/document.php?articleId=443

Ferrari, P. 2011. The dynamics of the competition between cars and trucks on motorways, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 19(4): 579–592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.09.012

Ferrari, P. 2009. The effect of the competition between cars and trucks on the evolution of the motorway transport system, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 17(6): 558–570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.05.002

Golob, T. F.; Recker, W. W.; Alvarez, V. M. 2004. Freeway safety as a function of traffic flow, Accident Analysis & Prevention 36(6): 933–946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2003.09.006

Hoogendoorn, S.; Knoop, V. 2013. Traffic flow theory and modelling, in B. Van Wee, J. A. Annema, D. Banister (Eds.). The Transport System and Transport Policy: an Introduction. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 125–159.

Katz, D. 2009. Heterogeneous Traffic Mixes. CEE 6603 – Term Paper. 11 p. Available from Internet: http://www.donald-katz.com/CEE%206603%20-%20Term%20Paper%20-%20Heterogeneous%20Traffic.pdf

Kerner, B. S. 2004. The Physics of Traffic: Empirical Freeway Pattern Features, Engineering Applications, and Theory. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 682 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-40986-1

Lasmini, A.; Pel, A. J.; Verhaeghe, R.; Van Arem, B. 2013. Empirical analysis of heterogeneous traffic flow, Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 9: 1–15.

Marchesini, P.; Weijermars, W. 2010. The Relationship between Road Safety and Congestion on Motorways: a Literature Review of Potential Effects. Report No R-2010-12. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research, The Netherlands. 30 p. Available from Internet: http://www.swov.nl/rapport/R-2010-12.pdf

Martin, J.-L. 2002. Relationship between crash rate and hourly traffic flow on interurban motorways, Accident Analysis & Prevention 34(5): 619–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00061-6

May, A. D. 1990. Traffic Flow Fundamentals. Prentice Hall. 464 p.

Mizanur, R.; Nakamura, F. 2005. A study on passing – over-taking characteristics and level of service of heterogeneous traffic flow, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 6: 1471–1483. http://doi.org/10.11175/easts.6.1471

Ortúzar, J. D.; Willumsen, L. G. 2011. Modelling Transport. 4th edition. Wiley. 607 p.

Papageorgiou, M. 2003. Traffic control, in R. W. Hall. (Ed.). Handbook of Transportation Science, 243–278.

Policija. 2015. Prometna varnost: statistika. Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve. Policija. Available from Internet: http://www.policija.si/index.php/statistika/prometna-varnost (in Slovenian).

Ramírez, B. A.; Izquierdo, F. A.; Fernández, C. G.; Méndez, A. G. 2009. The influence of heavy goods vehicle traffic on accidents on different types of Spanish interurban roads, Accident Analysis & Prevention 41(1): 15–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.016

Tiwari, G. 2000. Traffic flow and safety: need for new models for heterogeneous traffic, in D. Mohan, G. Tiwari (Eds.). Injury Prevention and Control, 73–91.

Uradni List. 2006. Pravilnik o omejitvi uporabe državnih cest za promet tovornih vozil, katerih največja dovoljena masa presega 7,5 ton, Uradni List – Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 102/2006: 10423–10424. (in Slovenian).

WHO. 2013. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2013: Supporting a Decade of Action. World Health Organization (WHO). 318 p. Available from Internet: http://www.who.int/iolence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2013/en